The Nationals Enquirer

Pedro Astacio In The Mix, Pending MRI

Pedro Astacio. Apparently a history of shoulder problems is a prerequisite for consideration for 3-4-5 slots in the rotation.

Robinson rips the club for not giving Lawrence an MRI:

"That's our bad...We chose not to give him an MRI. The physicals should cover everything...I would think that would be something to get our attention for the future, at least. Why not? [An MRI is] the only way you're going to be able to look at someone. But I don't make policy around here." (Frank Robinson, via Washington Post, 2/28/2006)

"It's expensive to do MRIs on every single transaction...In the case of Brian, he had made every single start the last four or five years. We saw him throw a three-hit shutout [in his final start of 2005]. We were trading a player [Castilla] with a bad knee. We felt that there was MRI risk on both sides if the deal was made, and we made a decision not to." (Jim Bowden, via Washington Times, 2/28/2006)

Meanwhile, in Boston, Red Sox deny rumors of an impending deal with the Nats, and Bronson Arroyo weighs in:

"Anything can happen, but I don't find it as being that valid...What's the worst-case scenario? We have seven [starters], right? Well, if I still think I'm one of the 12 best guys, I can still be on the club and pitch. Defensively, I don't think we need anybody else. [Unless] they want to go get somebody for me that's an unbelievable arm out of the pen, I don't see any other reason to make any other moves." (Bronson Arroyo, via Boston Globe, 2/28/2006)

A Farewell To Arm

Lawrence is done. But fear not: the Nationals still have the stitched-together labrums of Armas, Drese, and Rauch to shoulder the load.

Washington Post suggests the Nationals would like to make a deal with the Red Sox for Matt Clement, Bronson Arroyo, or David Wells, but they'd be priced out even if the Sox were interested. Sure would be nice to have a real owner in here to open the checkbook...

On The Bright Side...

...Dancing with LeCroy!

Hands down the best photo from spring training thus far.

(Photo by Haraz N Ghanbari/AP)

Judge Won't Evict Until MLB Signs Off On Deal

New stadium still looks to be right on schedule for a delayed completion, if MLB ever gets around to saying yes to the revised lease.

"If Major League Baseball approves the lease, and if the sale of [construction] bonds goes forward, I will promptly sign the order of possession...Yes, I am waiting. This case has a number of parties who have rights, and I have to be equitable in my responsibility." (Judge Joan Zeldon, via Washington Post 2/25/2006)

"We worked hard to make sure that every landowner was treated with respect and was well compensated for their property...It's our hope that we can begin building the ballpark this spring." (Vince Morris, mayor's spokesman, via Washington Times 2/25/2006)

Soriano: "I No Think About Outfield"

Well, that was easy! So, it's settled:

"The only thing that I know is that I'm happy to be here in Washington...I have one week to practice second base because I have to go to the [WBC]. And that's what I have now in my mind. I no think about outfield." (Alfonso Soriano, via Washington Post, 2/24/2006)

"Who knows? No decision is going to be made as to whether he is going to play second base or left field today, tomorrow, the next day or when he comes back. Those decisions will be made before we leave Florida." (Frank Robinson, via Washington Times, 2/24/2006)

"What's going on here is not [Soriano's] problem...What's going on here is not my problem. It's the team's problem" (Jose Vidro, via Washington Post, 2/24/2006)

"Our goal is to win and find a solution that works...Do we have the solution this moment? No. But we're going to work towards the solution, and we'll get one." (Jim Bowden, via Washington Times, 2/24/2006)

Fear not; no matter how Boz looks at it, it's a win-win for the Nats:

Actually, the Nats know that one of four scenarios will eventually play out. None is terrible. Most are good. Soriano can agree to play left field so Vidro can play second. This is the Nats' fantasy. Believe it when you see it. Or Soriano can play second and Vidro, if he demonstrates over the next four to eight weeks that his knee is healthy, can be traded. This is a high-probability outcome. Or Vidro, if healthy, can play second and Soriano can be traded. This is less likely. Soriano, with 35-homer, 30-steal skills, is a better fit for the Nationals' desperate offensive needs than the more subtle Vidro.

The fourth possibility, the nightmare scenario, is that Vidro's right knee will blow out for the third straight year, in which case Soriano will play second and Bowden will look brilliant for anticipating the problem and preempting a disaster.

(Tom Boswell, via Washington Post, 2/24/2006)

MASN Deal Still Stinks

Somewhere, Peter Angelos is smiling...

"It's a great package...All of the games are available. MASN is doing its part." (Todd Webster, MASN spokesman, via Washington Times, 2/224/2006)

(Clearly, Todd has DirecTV or RCN)

"Our more significant concern is how many cable households we are going to get into." (Tony Tavares, via Washington Post, 2/24/2006)

(Do you think Tony can get MASN at his apartment in Foggy Bottom?)

Happy Days Are Here Again: Fonz and Vidro to Report to Camp Today

Controversy? Nah, everything will work itself out today when Soriano arrives to camp and meets with Frank.

The Nationals expect both of their all-star second basemen, Jose Vidro and Alfonso Soriano, to report to camp on time Thursday -- at which point a delicate dance will begin among the two players and team officials over how to resolve what is a potentially volatile issue...Robinson said he expects to meet one-on-one with Soriano sometime Thursday morning, shortly after the player reports to camp. (via Washington Post 2/23/2006)

Bowden: "There Is No War Between Frank and I"

Trouble? There's no trouble. And there is no war. In an interview with NBC4's George Michael, Jim Bowden denies that there's trouble brewing between he and Old Frank.

(Thanks to the miracle of Tivo, an unofficial excerpt from the interview from WRC-TV NBC4, around 5:55 pm, 2/22/2006)

George Michael: "I wasn't even going to bring this up, does that mean I shouldn't worry about Frosty Forecast for Florida, that there's a war between you and Frank Robinson?"

Bowden: "Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha! There's no war. There's no war between Frank and I. I got a big kick out of that article, in fact I talked to both Frank and the writer today. And you know the fact of the matter is the article said we didn't get his input on the backup catcher. Just not true George. He was in the room at the winter meetings with myself, Bob Boone, Tony Tavares, Brian Barker, Tony Siegel when we went through the entire [list]. Frank has been involved."

Quotes from Robinson in the Washington Post and Washington Times regarding the backup catcher situation seem to indicate something entirely different:

"From what I read, that is the perfect scenario for this ballclub. That's what I read...That's the first time I've been asked. It's a little late now. You would think that would be something coming from the manager, wouldn't you? But you guys chose to go to the general manager. So I am not going to comment and second guess the general manager. I just work here." (Frank Robinson, via Washington Times, 2/22/2006)

"From what I read, that's the perfect scenario. . . I would think that would be something coming from the manager, wouldn't it? I'm not going to comment and second-guess the general manager." (Frank Robinson, via Washington Post, 2/22/2006)

>Meanwhile, on a totally unrelated note, Nationals dot com reports that the Nationals are trying to to extend Bowden's contract. His current deal is up on April 30.

MLB Goes Toe-to-Toe With Bygone Over Nationals Trademark

Because nothing is easy when you're talking baseball in Washington.

"Bygone is nothing more than the typical squatter who tries to take advantage of someone else's reputation...They filed for an historic name long associated with Major League Baseball in Washington at the very time it was public knowledge the Expos were relocating and D.C. was among the leading contenders." (Ethan Orlinsky, lawyer for MLB, via Washington Post 2/22/2006)

(Hey, didn't Ball-Wonk write about this last week? Yup, on the 15th.)

Meet The New Guzie, Same As The Old Guzie?

Don't know about you, but we've been waiting all winter to fill in the blank in this sentence:  "Cristian Guzman will be better in 2006 because of ______________." Guzman showed up camp yesterday and filled in the blank: laser eye surgery. And so, the sentence reads like this: "Cristian Guzman will be better in 2006 because of laser eye surgery". Now if only we knew what this 'little surprise' was that he mentioned.

"The people are going to like the new Guzie...I've got a little surprise for them" (Cristian Guzman, via Washington Post, 2/22/2006)

"Last year is the past...This is 2006. Everything is new. Everybody is going to know the Guzman of a couple of years ago. That's all I have on my mind. The fans are going to enjoy the new Guzie." (Cristian Guzman, via Nationals dot com, 2/21/2006)

"When you're struggling the whole year like that, you have to be strong to be happy every day...When you come to feel you're doing nothing for your teammates, you feel a little bit down...Now it's the first day I do BP here...I see the ball real good. ... It doesn't matter what people say. They're going to enjoy the new Guzie this year. I've got a little surprise for them." (Cristian Guzman, via AP/Yahoo Sports, 2/21/2006)

"We're not going to sit back...and watch Cristian Guzman have another year like he did last year." (Jim Bowden, via Washington Post, 2/22/2006)

Enquirer Answers The Mail Bag!

Back by popular demand, The Nationals Enquirer answers the Nationals dot com mailbag. The correct answers were posted yesterday on Nationals dot com; now we'll give it a shot.

I'm curious to know your gut feeling as to whether you think this year's team will be stronger than last year's. -- D.R., Chico, Calif.

My gut feeling tells me that when you add it all up, this year's model is about the same as last year's. The bullpen will be solid; the rotation is a question mark. The bench is better; but there's still no answer to the question of who will bat leadoff, etc. etc. We're probably talking about a .500 team. The good news is that they won't finish in last in the NL East; that role will be reserved for the slashed-and-burned Florida Marlins, who don't even slightly resemble the team that took the field last year to open the season. But the bad news is that they'll probably spend most of the season looking up at New York and Atlanta, and battling Philadelphia for third place.

I don't understand why the Nationals have been so critical of Ryan Church. He's done nothing but play well. I know they were upset that Church didn't play through the toe injury, but I don't see how making their displeasure so public can help his confidence at all.  -- J., Frederick, Md.

Yes.

How will being in the World Baseball Classic affect Chad Cordero and Brian Schneider with the Nationals?  -- W.G., Arlington, Va.

It can't help, that's for sure.

Reliever Joe Horgan pitched well when he came up in 2004. Last year, he wasn't so good. What is Horgan's status for 2006?  -- R.S., Richland, Wash.

The last we heard, he was still hosting Fear Factor.

Should the Nationals trade Alfonso Soriano for a good starting pitcher? He hasn't played one game for the team and he's already saying that he's not playing in the outfield.   -- S.P., Rimouski, Canada

Shhh...Don't tell anyone, but I actually like the Soriano for Wilkerson +2 deal. I know I shouldn't; everywhere you turn, someone else is calling this the worst move of the offseason. I've probably said it once or twice here myself. One SI columnist described Soriano as "a skinny Dave Kingman with wheels," which is at first glance pretty funny, but then when you think about it for a second, a fairly apt description.  Stat freaks have their collective pocket protectors in a bunch over the trade, all the people who loved Brad Wilkerson's game (count me out) are still crying over his departure, and I'm sure there's someone out there who can make an argument that throwing in Termell Sledge and Armando Galarraga to complete the deal makes this one of the worst move in the history of bad offseason moves. But for whatever reason, I'm optimistic that Frank will be able to work out the Soriano-Vidro problem. And I'm optimistic that Soriano is going to have a huge year (and yes, I've looked at his road numbers). Just a gut feeling. Take it or leave it.

But yeah, sure, back to your question: if a good starting pitcher comes available, should the Nats trade Soriano? Absolutely.

If the Nationals don't re-sign Nick Johnson to a multiyear deal, who will be Washington's starting first baseman of the future?  -- F.M., Reston, Va.

Larry Broadway.

Do you think the Nationals will carry 11 or 12 pitchers? It seems with their improved bench, 11 would make more sense.  -- S.C., Syracuse, N.Y.

No idea what they will do, but I think the team should carry a dozen.

Who is your all-time favorite Expo?  -- G., Avon, Ind.

Tim Raines.

With an organization that is short on pitching, how could the Nationals lose Darrell Rasner on waivers?  -- J.S., Perth, Ontario

I put in a call to Jim Bowden about this, but he never called back.

I know many believe that Sammy Sosa is washed up, but is it really fair to only offer him a $500,000 non-guaranteed contract, which is less than what Marlon Byrd makes?  -- D.C., Nova Scotia, Canada

Yes, it is fair. Really fair.

(all questions taken from The Washington Nationals Official Website)

After Livan & John, Rotation Is Pretty Much Crap a Crapshoot

 

Pick 3: Lawrence. Armas. Ortiz. Drese. Rauch. Hinckley.

"As a manager, coming to spring training and having to fill three spots on the starting rotation is not good, I don't care how you look at it...But we have to do that. And we'll get it done before we leave here." (Frank Robinson, via Washington Post 2/20/2006)

The Odd Couple Reunited In Viera

Long story short: Frank claims he doesn't know if the Soriano issue is actually an issue; he hasn't talked to him yet. Bowden continues to talk about his reluctant outfielder as if he's talking about a Little Leaguer.

"It's only an issue because you all make it an issue. I don't know if it's an issue or not. I'll let you all know after I talk to him when he gets here...I want to listen to him...hear what he has to say." (Frank Robinson via Washington Times, 2/19/2006)

"I don't think enough people are understanding what he has gone through...This is a player who was happy in Texas, and who was traded. And as soon as he's traded, he learns that the team that gets him wants him to play a different position. And then the player ends up going to [salary] arbitration and losing in arbitration...This is a special player, and he has a lot of pride, and he's a sensitive guy. He's been through an awful lot this offseason." (Jim Bowden, via Washington Post, 2/19/2006)

Oh, boo hoo, cry me a #@!&ing river. Memo to Jim: if case you've forgotten, YOU'RE the one who traded for him and YOU'RE the one who made him 'suffer' through arbitration. 'He's been through an awful lot this offseason?' He got a #@!&ing $2.5 MILLION DOLLAR RAISE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!

To be a fly on the wall in Old Frank's office that first day Soriano arrives at camp and gets called in for The Talk with his new manager. We think it will go something like this:

Frank: "You're an outfielder now."

Soriano:  "Okay."

Frank: "Now get out of my sight."

Soriano: "Okay."

And that will be the end of the discussion. (And you know what? Wherever he plays this year, whether at 2nd base, center field, in Washington, or somewhere else, we think Soriano is going to have a monster year - he's playing for a contract.)

(AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)

Pitchers and Catchers Report!

At long last, pitchers and catchers report to camp in beautiful (ok, we know that's a stretch) Viera FLA. The Enquirer suggests staring at the above postcard and repeating "Spring is in the air" over and over again while ignoring the DC forecast for the next two days.

Ticking Timebomb Guillen Sounds Off

In no particular order: Guillen throws Nationals' medical staff under the bus, throws down the gauntlet to Soriano, complains about the fences at RFK,  tells Jim to fix the Vidro/Soriano mess at second base, hints that he might be ready for Opening Day (but maybe not), and talks about negotiating a new contract.

"It was pretty ugly. I saw the pictures...It was not a slight tear, like [the team's medical staff] said. It was pretty much broken in half. . . . I was kind of mad at those guys, because they should know what was going on in there. But I really blame myself, because I was the one who wanted to keep playing."

...

"Everybody knows about this ballpark, how many home runs I lost there...I'd like to see somebody [*cough*cough*Soriano*cough*] coming from another team [where he has hit] 40 home runs -- let's see how many home runs they hit here. I'm not going to mention no one's names [*cough*Soriano]. But just come here. And we'll see who has the real power here."

(Jose Guillen, via Washington Post, 2/17/2006)

But it gets worse. How about this gem from Bowden?

"We'd like to lock up all three of our big potential free agents -- Jose Guillen, Alfonso Soriano and Nick Johnson" (Jim Bowden, via Washington Post, 2/17/2006)

Memo to Bud: Please get an owner in here quick.

Sammy's Reasons Why Not

Sosa rejects Nats best offer; might actually be more productive this year if he retires. His agent Adam Katz jokes that it wasn't about the money. (Good for Bowden for not offering anything guaranteed.)

"It's very likely we're not going to see Sammy in uniform again." (Adam Katz, Sammy's agent, via Washington Post 2/16/2006)

"This was not a money issue...Was the money fabulous? No. Was it part of the decision-making process? Absolutely. … But by no means was it the only thing involved. In the end, the money was a secondary, maybe even a tertiary consideration." (Adam Katz, via Chicago Tribune 2/15/2006)

"Our interest in Sammy was as insurance on Jose Guillen's shoulder and Alfonso Soriano's reluctance to move to the outfield...But we feel we have enough depth there. Sammy was just kind of a unique opportunity." (Jim Bowden, via Washington Times, 2/16/2006)

Gandhi Gives Thumbs Up To Deal

DC CFO Gandhi oks the deal. I was certain he would come back with a list of revisions, but his only concern is cost overruns. If MLB agrees to the lease, Gandhi will issue bonds, and then we can look forward to a groundbreaking in March where everyone on the city council shows up with their construction helmets and shovels for the photo op. That is, everyone except Catania, Mendelson, Graham, and Fenty, who all voted nay on the deal.

"Right now, the major issue for me is MLB agreeing the District will not have to pay for [cost] overruns...I'll wait to see what they sign. Then I'll certify it." (Natwar Gandhi, DC CEO via Washington Post, 2/14/2006)

Meanwhile, Anthony Williams said yesterday that he expects MLB to make a decision by the end of the week, and Bob DuPuy indicated that once an agreement is reached, the new owner will be revealed within 30 days. (via AP/wtop dot com 2/13/2006)

Enquirer Answers The Mail Bag!

Back by popular demand, The Nationals Enquirer answers the Nationals dot com mailbag. The correct answers were posted earlier today at Nationals dot com; now we'll give it a shot. Full disclosure: not really feeling it tonight, so we'll just mail this thing in and be done with it.

Cristian Guzman had a tough year last season. What are the chances of the Nationals trading or releasing him?  -- M. M., Alexandria, Va.

We appreciate your sense of humor.

In parts of 15 seasons as a Major League manager, Frank Robinson has never managed a team into the postseason and he has a career winning percentage under .500. Why is Robinson still managing a Major League team?  -- A. O., Montreal

You know, I asked a guy from Montreal last week whatever happened to Youppi, but he didn't get back to me on that. And while we're on the topic, did you hear about the Nats' new mascot?

If Nick Johnson has a big year, do you think the Nationals will shell out the money to sign him to a multiyear deal?  -- Nick J., Richmond, Va.

Hey, look at that - Nick J asking about Nick J. Anyway, the answer to your question is:

Probably not, not with Mr. Broadway waiting in the wings.

I remember after the first three months of the 2005 season, there was talk about Ryan Church being in the hunt for the Rookie of the Year Award. Why do the Nationals keep signing all these outfielders when they have a very special one right under their noses?  -- M. O., Springfield, Va.

The answer is quite simple: Anosmia. Which explains a lot, actually.

How do you explain the roster moves that general manager Jim Bowden made during the 2005 season, like letting go Sun-Woo Kim and trading Zach Day and Tomo Ohka?  -- S. D., Bergen Co., N.J.

Hey, S.D., I've got cousins from Bergen. So, let's see. Zach Day is terrible, ok? And trading him and JJ Davis away for Preston Wilson last season was a good move - regardless of the fact that Wilson turned out to be a tremendous bust in Washington. I have a hard time faulting Bowden on that one, seeing as how it came at a time when the Nats were still in first place but were struggling badly offensively. At least it made sense at the time. The Tomo Ohka move, on the other hand, made no sense. The Nats had no need for Junior Spivey, but shipped out Ohka simply because he showed up Old Frank. And finally, no explanation for letting Sunny Kim go. Bad move blah waivers blah blah etc. etc. I'm tired.

Following the final day of the 2004 season, the franchise had helmets, jerseys, bags, jackets and many other items that carried the distinctive Expos logo and name. Whatever happened to all those things?  -- F. R., Pocatello, Idaho

They buried them in Pocatello, Idaho.

Last year, the Nationals had one of the lowest-ranking teams in stolen bases. Seeing the size of the park, should they concentrate on having a team with speed and defense, rather than putting in the names like Sammy Sosa?  -- M. B, Epsom N.H.

Yes, hence the signing of Matt LeCroy.

Has there been any discussion about moving the fences in at RFK Stadium?
-- J.D., Alexandria, Va.

We're having it right now.

(all questions taken from The Washington Nationals Official Website)

Fare Thee Well, Jamey Carroll

Squeezed out: Nationals sell Jamey Carroll to Colorado for $300 K, freeing up one spot on the 40-man roster. Sammy Sosa announcement coming soon? Nats met with his agent today, after all...

"I'd like to thank Jamey for his long-standing and numerous contributions to the Nationals/Expos franchise...During his time here, Jamey was the ultimate teammate, whose integrity and work ethic were contagious. We wish Jamey and his family nothing but the best." (Jim Bowden, via MLB.com/Press Release 2/11/2006)

(Photo by Sol Tucker/Pointed Magazine Staff)

Nats Unveil New Mascot

Team to make official announcement after the stadium lease deal is settled and a new owner is in place.

(Photo courtesy of NBC's official Olympics website.)

DuPuy Drops a Bombshell: Baseball Has Questions About Cost Cap

Surprised? It sure doesn't sound like MLB will get behind the new deal as currently constituted; could the District and Baseball be heading to arbitration after all? (Meanwhile, the Williams camp continues to view the world through rose-colored glasses...)

"It clearly contains conditions, restrictions and new provisions which go well beyond our previous agreements and raises a number of questions...We want to make sure that the kind of ballpark we agreed upon will be built." (Bob Dupuy, via Washington Post 2/11/2006)

"We want to make sure that the kind of ballpark we agreed upon will be built, that it can be paid for as we have agreed, that the team be able to exercise adequate control over the ballpark site, that we understand the limits of the legislative power to further rewrite contracts we enter into and that the balance of burdens and benefits agreed to by us in mediation is readdressed, since it has been seriously disrupted by the legislation." (Bob DuPuy, via mlb.com 2/10/2006)

"It's a good sign. It shows MLB is just as keen to press ahead with the ballpark as we are...So far as we can tell, the late-night revisions made by the council do not jeopardize the deal and mostly reaffirm our existing plans."  (Williams' spokesman Vince Morris, via AP 2/10/2006)

(Baltimore Sun photo by Kenneth K. Lam)

Waiver Wire Casualty: Darrell Rasner Claimed By Yankees

Because you can never have too much pitching too many spare parts on your 40-man roster.

Yanks claim Rasner. No matter how you spin it, this one just doesn't add up. There wasn't a light hitting utility infielder available to be sacrificed instead?

Nats Win First Battle Against "Sensitive, Caring" Soriano

Soriano loses his arbitration case against the Nats, settling for a paltry $10 million in 2006, $2 million less than he was looking for. Now the real battle begins.

Heartwarming elevator encounter between Bowden and the Fonz recounted in the Washington Post.

Bowden holds his ground in Florida Today Q&A:

"If Vidro is healthy, Vidro is our second baseman. Jose Vidro is not a player that has other places he can play and be as effective as he is at second, where we feel that Soriano is so talented that he could move to either center or left field and really help our team...He's a really good kid. He's a caring, sensitive person. " (Jim Bowden via Florida Today 2/10/2006)

Bowden On Steroids

Considering the Nats' interest in certain former sluggers this offseason, Bowden offers an interesting answer to the question of whether he thinks baseball's steroid problem has been cleaned up:

"Well, the problem has gone away because the players are going to be tested so many times that if you are guilty you are going to be caught. The fallout is still ongoing. In other words, there are players out there that we don't know whether they did or they didn't (use steroids) before testing.

You're seeing performance drop dramatically, you're seeing size drop dramatically and you don't know as a GM, Well, did this player have an off year? Or could this player have been on steroids and now is off them, and now we're seeing what the real player is without steroids?" (Jim Bowden, via Q&A on Florida Today 2/10/2006)

On an unrelated note, the Nationals will meet with Sammy Sosa's agent Adam Katz on Saturday, according to MLB.com.

Bud: "We don't know what we're looking at yet"

Doesn't sound like anyone does. MLB reviewing the new deal. And don't underestimate the potential for Gandhi to further complicate the situation.

Far From Over: MLB "Very Concerned" About New Deal

As council members pat themselves on the back for passing...something, is there any reason to be confident that MLB will approve the new lease deal?

"We are very concerned about what we heard during the debate, and we need to read the materials and the legislative language so we can determine whether they are consistent with the agreements between Major League Baseball and the city." (Richard Levin, MLB spokesman, via Washington Post 2/09/2006)

"I'm looking to get the project under way so we can talk about the benefits...I would hope they sign it as quickly as possible so they can name an owner." (Mayor Williams, via Washington Times 2/09/2006)

Soriano's Arbitration Hearing Set For Today

Mr. "There Is No I In Team" wants $12 million; Nats offered $10 million. Hearing set for 2 pm.

Could Bowden's big headache be going to the Cubs if Sammy makes the team?

The Cubs long have had an interest in Soriano, but Washington came up with a better trade offer from the Rangers over the winter...He continues to insist he will not play the outfield, creating a National problem because Jose Vidro is their second baseman.

Either Soriano or Vidro might have to go if Sosa makes the team and it probably would be Soriano, who will make either $10 million or $12 million next season, depending on the outcome of Thursday's arbitration hearing. The Nationals most likely would like a front-line pitcher in return, although they may have to settle for less. (via Chicago Tribune 2/08/2006)

Nats Bulk Up With LeCroy

Nats sign DH Matt LeCroy to a one year, $850 K deal. Too bad there's no DH in the NL. He's being touted as a backup option for Schneider, although he spent just 1 inning behind the plate last year in Minnesota. More likely, he'll spend most of his time at first base facing lefties during Nick Johnson's inevitable 30-60 game stint on the DL. Has some power, but struggles against right handed pitching. And didn't really hit at all away from the friendly confines of the Metrodome, but we'll ignore that. Hey Matt, my beer league softball team needs a first baseman, so if it doesn't work out with the Nats, pick up the phone and give me a call.

"With the addition of Matt LeCroy, I am pleased to add a professional right-handed hitter to our bench who can also serve as a backup at both catcher and first base." (Jim Bowden, via mlb.com 2/08/2006)

This video from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety will help you get to know a little more about the newest Nat.

(Photo of Matt LeCroy from Minnesota Department of Public Safety Web Site)

Say It Isn't So(sa)

Nats reportedly offer Sammy Sosa a one year, incentive laden deal. (Hey Fenty, if you thought the lease was a bad deal for the city, wait 'til you see Sosa flailing about at RFK this year!)

Nationals general manager Jim Bowden said Tuesday the team has offered Sosa a guaranteed major-league contract and is waiting to see if the seven-time All-Star accepts it. The deal is believed to be for only one year and laden with incentives. (via Florida Today 2/08/2006)

Council Approves a Lease, But Will MLB Go Along With It?

After rejecting the original agreement, the council attempts to save face and save baseball in the District by approving a new deal to cap costs at $611 million. Now we'll have to wait and see what MLB thinks.

"Today's vote is a serious setback to all those in the Washington community who sought the return of a team to the nation's capital...I regret very much that D.C. officials have failed to honor the agreement they made when they successfully bid for the Expos to move to Washington. Baseball has no choice but to pursue arbitration so the terms of our original agreement can be honored and to begin to explore whatever options are available to us" (MLB President Bob DuPuy after the lease was rejected, via Washington Times 2/08/2006)

"I have no comment until we study this...The city has an obligation to build a stadium in conformity with the Basic Stadium Agreement." (Bob DuPuy after the new new lease was agreed upon, via Washington Post, 2/08/2006)

"I hope everyone who voted for this gets a thank you note from baseball...We are voting on a very unfair deal that every member of this council would say is a bad deal." (Adrian Fenty, via Washington Post 2/08/2006)

The Future Of Baseball In DC Hanging In The Balance

Let's see if we have this straight: Without the emergency legislation proposed last night by Cropp to cap the city's costs at $300 million, the lease as submitted (actually it was submitted, then resubmitted and then re-resubmitted) probably would not have passed tonight's vote. But nobody seems certain if the new legislation, let's call it the "really  guaranteed maximum price" (not to be confused with Mayor Williams' "guaranteed maximum price") , will be accepted by the other parties involved: MLB and the Clark/Hunt/Smoot construction companies.

So if the council votes yes on this stack of papers that resembles the original agreement tonight, we're not sure if that means anything to MLB.

And if the council does not approve the stack of papers tonight, MLB might choose to go to full arbitration, which could mean another six months of wrangling over this deal. Or, there's always that other option.

So regardless of what the council decides tonight, our pessimistic side is telling us that this thing is far from over.

"We're basically just doing a crapshoot and saying, 'Well, let's just blow up all the work we've put in here over the last four or five months, go back to arbitration and square one and run the risk of [the Nationals] leaving in June." (Mayor Williams, 2/07/2006 via Washington Times)

"There is a lot the mayor has not delivered...There's a lot of work left to be done." (Kwame Brown, 2/07/2006 via Washington Post)

"The key will be how they write the provision...If they write it in such a way that they attempt to undo what we already agreed to [with baseball officials], then we'll have problems. But if they come up with something that strengthens what we already agreed to, then there's no problem, and we can go forward." (Vince Morris spokesman for Mayor Williams, via Washington Post 2/07/2006)

"We're getting to a point where if we do not act, we're adding to the [stadium] cost overruns...We can't let anyone use the excuse that the council has not acted. This is a responsible approach." (Linda Cropp, via Washington Times 2/07/2006)

Enquirer Answers The Mail Bag!

Back by popular demand, The Nationals Enquirer answers the mailbag for MLB.com's Nationals beat writer Bill Ladson.  Bill provided his answers earlier today. Now we'll give it a shot.

Every time Jamey Carroll is mentioned, his name is accompanied by the phrase, "the most fundamentally sound player on the team." What exactly does that mean? -- M. L., Washington, D.C.

It's just another way of saying that Jamey is a light hitting utility infielder who hustles down the first base line every time he grounds out.

Should the Nationals try to trade Carroll? He probably won't get much playing time with Marlon Anderson, Robert Fick and Royce Clayton on the bench. -- D. C., Nova Scotia, Canada

Yes, they should try to trade Carroll, but it's doubtful that they could. Playing time isn't the issue here - the question is whether the Nats will even have a roster spot available for him by the time they break camp. Don't expect him to stick; look for him to be released or offered a chance to start the season with AAA New Orleans.

What solutions have been made to make sure that the Nationals don't fade in the second half of 2006 like they did last year? The first half of 2005 was so promising. I'd like to see that success throughout the entire '06 season. -- M. D., Montreal

The secret to a no-fade '06? More utility infielders per capita than any other city in the majors.

But here's a more important question for you, since you're from Montreal and all: Whatever happened to Youppi?

What is going on with Sammy Sosa? Are the Nationals going to wait until the last minute to sign him? -- K. J., Lake Park, Fla.

We put in a call to Bowden himself to ask him about the Sosa situation, but we got his voicemail. He never called back. Come to think of it, we called him last week to ask him about the state of the starting rotation, but he must have had a real busy week, since we never heard back from him. Jim, if you're reading this: Call me.

With all questions regarding the Nationals' Opening Day infield, how do you see Brendan Harris fitting into the picture? -- B. F., Thunder Bay, Ontario

Thunder Bay in the House!! Well...he'll probably start the season at AAA New Orleans or something.

Do you think Robinson needs to be more patient with his starting pitchers? He used his bullpen quite a bit in 2005. -- M. Z., Utica, N.Y.

We put in a call to John Halama to ask his opinion, but we got his voicemail. He never called back.

(all questions taken from The Washington Nationals Official Website; please don't sue us. Thank you)

Vegas, Baby?

Worth noting that MLB has given Florida Marlins (and former Montreal Expos) owner Jeffrey Loria permission to explore relocating the Marlins, BUT MLB is not allowing the Marlins to talk to Las Vegas.

Vegas, of course, was one of the finalists in the running for the Expos.

"Vegas officials have reached out directly to Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria, but Loria's hands are tied. Though Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman has suggested stadium financing wouldn't be a problem (he has never offered specifics), none of the Marlins' other suitors has offered a better financing package than the one available here." (via Miami Herald 2/05/2005)

We've been afraid to think about it, but: What happens if the lease gets shot down by the city council on Tuesday? Would MLB walk out on Washington? Could Vegas be in play?

More Lucchino To DC Speculation

When it finally happens, don't forget we told you so.

With Theo Epstein back in power in Boston, speculation is growing that Larry Lucchino might leave. Lucchino is a Washington native, so perhaps that's a possibility. Epstein and Lucchino were said by Red Sox people to have worked well together in the past, but Lucchino's "slow-play strategy" in Epstein's contract talk drove a wedge between them. (Jon Heyman via NY Newsday 2/05/2006)

>Also notable from Heyman, Kasten in the ownership mix?

Baseball leaders are frustrated by Washington politics and can't believe they haven't been able to name a new ownership team yet. The last word was that groups led by Jeff Smulyan and Ted Lerner were leading. But don't count out Braves exec Stan Kasten, who could be in the mix. (Jon Heyman via NY Newsday 2/05/2006)

Nah, we all know it's gonna be Smulyan.

Williams: Heaven and Earth Moved To Get Revised Lease Details To Council

Mayor Anthony Williams finally handed over the "guranteed maximum price" cost capping details to the council yesterday. Construction costs capped at $320 mil. Vote still set for Tuesday, but it will take an act of divine intervention to get this thing to pass.

"The council should declare victory, say they improved the deal and move forward...We moved heaven and earth to get this to them today. We should vote Tuesday. The idea that this process can go on indefinitely is not okay with me." (Mayor Anthony Williams, via Washington Post 2/04/2006)

Council Chairman Linda Cropp said she was unsure of whether the council would approve the lease Tuesday, since the attorneys and many council members had not yet reviewed many of the new documents. (via Washington Times 2/04/2006)

"I'm not there yet...I have asked chairman Cropp to postpone the vote." (Kwame Brown via Washinton Times 2/04/2006)

"The big issue is when you add all this up, what is it going to cost the city?...The biggest issue of contention for me is that baseball is getting something for nothing. They're not going to make money on us." (Marion Barry via Washington Times 2/04/2006)

(Photo by Mannie Garcia / Reuters)

Vidro Cleared To Play In WBC

"I have worked with José since 2003 and this is the best condition in which I have seen it.  It is seen cut and has lost a lot of grease." (Bruce Thomas, Nationals team doctor, via Primera Hora 2/03/2006)

Or something like that. In what may be an indication of the status of his balky knee and ankle, José Vidro has apparently been cleared by the Nationals to play for Puerto Rico in the World Baseball Classic, according to the AP, which quotes Nats' team spokesman John Dever as giving the green light in Primera Hora, a Puerto Rican daily newspaper.

Just for fun, we ran Friday's story from Primera Hora through a Spanish to English online translator, and this is what we came up with:

Vidro will be able to play in the Classic

The National of Washington announced yesterday that the stellar one intermedista José Vidro will have permission to play with Puerto Rico in the World Classic of Baseball.

After several days of bad news before the possible drop of the toletero ponceño Javy López, the team of Puerto Rico received a refreshing air with the news that they will include Vidro in the second base. 

"José Vidro is eligible to play for Puerto Rico in the World Classic of Baseball", indicated John Dever, spokesman of the National, in interview with FIRST HOUR. 

The participation of Vidro in the event was in suspense from the middle of December, when Dever reported that Washington had objected it. 

At that time, the statement of the National indicated: "due to matters of health, the National will not permit that José Vidro play in the first World Classic of Baseball". 

Vidro comes to pass for a season limited by problems with an ankle and then with the right knee.  The form of objection of the National alluded to the knee, but the management of the team of Puerto Rico was maintained optimist that Washington would give him so quick permission the intermedista were evaluated by the doctors in the camps of training. 

Dever assured yesterday that did not have information by what the National approved the permission.  "Jim (Bowden, general manager of the National) only reported me that has permission to play". 

All indicates to that itself due to the good results of Vidro in the exams to the ones that was submitted by the doctor of the National, Bruce Thomas, when came to Puerto Rico the past Sunday 21 of January, together al physical coach of the team, Kazuhiko Tomooka. 

Thomas remained "static" al to see that the knee of Vidro was better and in good condition.

"I have worked with José since 2003 and this is the best condition in which I have seen it.  It is seen cut and has lost a lot of grease", said Thomas to mlb.com. 

The physician explained that to show him how well he was, he did exercises of legs and he jumped without feeling pain.  Besides, time ago that Vidro already he was batting both-sided of the dish and collecting roletas. 

Due to that the second base sabaneño wants to play for Puerto Rico in the Classic, Thomas indicated that for the moment gave him a "cautious green light" to participate in the event.

So what did we learn? Well, besides the fact that Spanish to English online translators are loads of fun, Vidro is healthy enough to play for Puerto Rico (we'll ignore the part about 'losing a lot of grease' because who knows what that means) , so presumably he should be ready to go for Opening Day, April 3rd, turning The Soriano Situation into a four-alarm crisis. Somebody's gotta get traded, and quick.

Update 2/04/2006: A bit more info on Vidro's health from the FOXSports.com, and a better translation of that Bruce Thomas quote above. This is old news (from last Saturday) but it's news to us (although Ladson mentioned it in passing in his mailbag, we missed it):

Nationals team doctor Bruce Thomas went to Puerto Rico to see Jose Vidro last Saturday and was "ecstatic" to see that the second baseman's injured right knee is much better, and that he is in great shape.

"I have been working with Jose since 2003, and this is the best shape I've ever seen him in. He looks trim and has lost body fat," Dr. Thomas said. Vidro is already doing baseball activities, swinging from both sides of the plate and talking routine ground balls. It looks like he might even play for Puerto Rico in the WBC. (via FoxSports.com Sat. 1/28/2006)

Royce Rolls In To Put The Heat On Guzman

"We're not going to sit back and watch Cristian Guzman have another year like he did last year...This [signing] gives us a viable option to go to in the event we don't see improvement from Guzman." (Jim Bowden via Washington Post 02/03/2006)

"I told Jim, 'Whatever it takes for the team to win, that's what I'm all about...Coming in, I'm just going to prepare myself like I have in the past. I'm going to get ready to play 162 games. I'll let everything else take care of itself. I have a tremendous amount of respect for [manager] Frank Robinson, and I know he will put out the best lineup that's going to help the team win, and that all you want." (Royce Clayton via MLB.com 02/02/2006)

(Photo by Francisco Medina/Tucson Citizen)

Deutsche Bagged: Private Financing Deal Is Dead

 

And the beat goes on: $246 mil private stadium financing deal with Deutsche Bank is kaput. Let the finger pointing and buck passing begin.

"It was never my plan. It was a plan that was recommended by the CFO." (Linda Cropp, via Washington Post 2/02/2006)

"We'll have the lawyers figure it out." (Natwar Gandhi, via Washington Post 2/02/2006)

Meanwhile, DC Council still on track for The Vote on Tuesday

"I don't have any intention whatsoever of pulling this." (Anthony Williams, via Washington Times 2/02/2006)

"I like free tickets for kids, but that's not what moves me...There's been some progress made, but there are some unanswered questions." (Kwame Brown, via Washington Times 2/02/2006)

Hello, F-Rod

Nats betting $600K that Felix Rodriguez will bounce back after an injury shortened  season last year with the Yankees (5.01 ERA - 34 G, 32.1 IP, 33H, 18ER, 20BB, 18K).

Let's see, is there anything else to say that hasn't been said already?

-A few seasons ago there, he was a great setup man.

-According to his bio on mlb.com, F-Rod "lent his name and image to the Giants "Travel Safely" campaign, which recognized the importance of safe travel and various transit agencies throughout the Bay Area."

-Do you think he's really 33?

(photo from expressfan.com)

Gandhi Gets Williams To Change Lease (Again)

But this time, the lease is really, really, really done. Everybody ready for that easy council vote next Tuesday?

Asked whether he was satisfied, Gandhi said: "I think so. I'll wait to see the final paperwork. (via Washington Post 02/01/2006)

"They still have a distance to go...There are seven or eight of us who are not comfortable to approve the lease as they described it." (Marion Barry, via Washington Post 02/01/2006)

(Photo from bizforward.com)