« Shairon Martis should probably start looking for an apartment in DC/MD/VA | Main | Apparently, there was no handshake agreement to save Wily Mo. »

March 26, 2009

3+ Weeks later, and
Jim Bowden is still a major pain in the ass.

20090207jb 

Jimbo won't go away, ever.

The gift that keeps on giving: Jimbo's inexplicable handshake agreement with Dmitri Young forces Stan's hand; Da MeatShake to be added to Nats' 40-man roster before Opening Day. Via Nationals Journal:

The Nationals intend to add Dmitri Young to the 40-man roster before Opening Day because of a handshake agreement that was made this winter between Young and then-General Manager Jim Bowden.

Good for the Nats for honoring the "agreement", as bizarre and inexplicable as it may be. But the obvious next questions get a little scary: How many other handshake agreements did Jimbo make with other embedded ex-Reds on the payroll, and will the Nats honor those handshakes, too? Don't be surprised when Javier Valentin is suddenly named starting catcher, and Wily Mo Pena is starting in left. We're only half-kidding about that.

Now, just for fun, let's revisit an ominous headline over at Nationals dot com from a little over a week ago, on the day Da MeatShake took batting practice, "marking the first time since early March that he was able to do any baseball activities." Seemed then like it was only a matter of time:

Young takes batting practice

Door slowly closing on vet's chances to make Nats' roster

Little did we know that door would be wrenched back open by Jim Bowden's hand.

Over at NTP, Nate explains his reasons for not being as ticked off as he probably should be.

(Photo of Jim Bowden on TV by The Nationals Enquirer staff)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c562353ef01156e6a8916970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 3+ Weeks later, and
Jim Bowden is still a major pain in the ass.
:

Comments

Which is not to say that I'm not still ticked off.

If Bowden's superiors did not know about the handshake deal at the time it was made (or at least up until the point of Bowden's "resignation", wouldn't they let whomever told them about it now know that they don't believe them?

If the only parties to the handshake deal were Bowden and Young, then Rizzo, Kasten, and the Lerners can tell anyone seeking enforcement of it that they are "just making this up." Even if Bowden were to vouch for the deal after the fact, such assurance would have no effect.

It seems to me that the club is honoring the handshake because they sanctioned it at the time it was made or soon thereafter.

If not, how much would I have to pay Bowden to vouch that he and I had a handshake deal made on December 12, 2008 that the Nats would pay me $300,000 on April 6, 2009?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Who We Are

  • Your source for uninformed opinion, rumors, and misinformation about the Washington Nationals.
    [email protected]

  • Spring Training 09

Nats and/or DC Blogs, etc.

NL East Blogs

Other MLB blogs

Home Team Links

Search the Natosphere

-------------